HR Pulse




Menu Style



Taking big risks can yield big profits - if the strategy is solid

Mastering business strategy will not only enhance personal effectiveness for business leaders but will also improve organisational efficacy, profitability and sustainability.


What is altrocentric leadership?

The good old days where employees just knew their CEO's name, face and business reputation are a thing of the past. Today, they also know their CEO's salary, hometown, connections on LinkedIn and how much their house is worth. Along with this increasing transparency comes growing pressure to be accountable. Good leaders have always stepped out of their comfort zones, but converging global megatrends are putting more pressure on those at the top to navigate a faster, more complex, more integrated, and more transparent business world.


Are you an authentic leader?

'Authentic leadership'. We hear this phrase bandied around in the corporate space all the time. But what does it really mean in a leadership context?


What to do when your employees won’t follow your lead

It's all terribly simple. You're in a managerial role because you've proven yourself and have been the most adept at 'getting stuff done'. Unfortunately, being responsible for employee management isn't simple: achieving an objective yourself, and the ability to get a group of people to achieve those same goals, are two very different skills sets. What happens when your team won't move in the same direction or aren't motivated? What can you do when your team is just not receptive to your well-meaning efforts?


The five ‘love languages’ in leadership

If you have had the good fortune to read The 5 Love Languages by Gary Chapman, you'll know that these are: words of affirmation, acts of service, quality time, physical touch and gifts. The basic premise is that every human being has a vital 'love language' and sees different acts as expressions of love. So then it stands to reason that showering someone with gifts when it's not their 'love language' can only serve to irritate/alienate. So how does this theory translate into the leadership sphere?